Our Notable Cases

CLI v CLJ [2021] SGHC(A) 3

REPRESENTED BY

profile picture of walter silvester

Walter Silvester
Email: walter@silvesterlegal.com

profile picture of tan hoe

Tan Hoe Shuen
Email: hoeshuen@silvesterlegal.com

WHAT WE ACHIEVED

The appeal was eventually set aside and costs of $2,600 were awarded to the Respondent Wife.

CASE SUMMARY

[Family Law – divorce, care and control of children of a marriage]

 

The Applicant was the Husband of the marriage whereas the Respondent was the Wife. Mr Low and Mr Tan argued for the Applicant to have a 5:2 split of the care and control arrangements of the eldest child, whereby one party would take care of the child for 5 weekdays and the other party would take care of the child for 2 weekdays. Despite our best efforts, the Court did not view this as an equal distribution pursuant to a shared care and control arrangement and ultimately ruled that the children’s interests are still the paramount consideration. 

 

In arriving to its decision, the Court ruled that subjecting the young 8-year old child to a 5:2 day split would be too disruptive and that the acrimony between the parties would make it difficult to have the higher degree of cooperation needed for this proposed arrangement.

Participate in Straits Times “Singapore’s Best Law Firms 2023” Survey

X